Wednesday, March 12, 2014

Blog for 3/11


After reading literature on comprehension strategies, I have learned a great deal about my own comprehension processes and the reading behaviors of learners in the classroom. In one reading, Applegate, Quinn, and Applegate (2006) classified eight common profiles of thinking readers can fall into that are considered “pitfalls” of successful reading comprehension. These profiles include literalists, fuzzy thinkers, left fielders, quiz contestants, politicians, dodgers, authors, and minimalists. Thinking about each of these tendencies and reflecting upon my own comprehension, I have found that I sometimes fall into the category of a “quiz contestant.” According to Applegate, Quinn, and Applegate, a “quiz contestant” responds to questions on the text by searching their memory bank, but often disconnects from the text before they think of their own examples. I have found that I do this in comprehension when I read about a topic of interest and think of stories from my own life, but then fail to connect my story back to the text. I can work on improving this in my own comprehension by remembering to compare my background knowledge and experiences back to the stories I read.

In addition to learning about common pitfalls of comprehension, I also learned about reading strategies and processes my students and I should engage in each time we read.  The reading processes are prereading, reading, responding, exploring and applying (Tompkins 2010). The strategies we should use in the stages are activating background knowledge, connecting, determining importance, drawing inferences, evaluating, monitoring, predicting, questioning, repairing, setting a purpose, summarizing, and visualizing (Tompkins 2010). Thinking on my own reading patterns, I realized that I do not often set a clear purpose for texts before I read. Neglecting this strategy could be problematic in both my own comprehension and my future teaching. In the future, I will work to identifying the focus of my reading through texts before I read.

While these reading processes and strategies outlined in Tompkins are helpful to my own comprehension, they are crucial guidelines for teaching literacy to my future students. In my future classroom, I can make sure to regularly participate in each reading process with my students and teach them the appropriate strategies they should use when reading. In addition to outlining the strategies, Tompkins noted that assessments in each of these categories are crucial. Therefore, in my future teaching, I plan to both teach and assess my students’ progress in each of these areas. Furthermore, I can carefully observe and record their reading patterns to see if they fall into any of the eight profiles that could inhibit their comprehension. By understanding these clear goals and assessing my students’ progress, I can give each student the instruction they need to improve their reading comprehension.